The result of the court of law has to write, exercise in an open court, and establish an argumentative trial with complete due process, with an chance on behalf of demonstration of proof by the defense and the freedom to interrogate bystanders.
Their main argument is that trying juveniles as adults means that the legal system has failed to consider their social and emotional development which is different from that of adults Cole and Smith Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults?
About 3, of those were sentenced to life without parole. It is only logical to say that the juvenile has engaged in adult behavior and has declared him or herself an adult in crime. Those who commit capitol crimes, including adolescents, should be penalized according to the law.
If they did the crime, they should do the time.
Second Advantage to Solution: The jurisdictive disclaimer procedure normally emphases on age, crime, criminal record, and the adolescent's willingness to rehabilitation. Once a child goes beyond that age and he or she maliciously commits a crime like murder, then they should be tried as adults.
That is not to say that violent crime among youths is uncommon. Would it be ok telling a twelve year old kid that has committed a crime, that he or she is sentenced to doing life in prison.
There are multiple pros and cons to juveniles being tried as adult. Right now, kids old enough to commit crime, too young to do time. Legal elimination is unmistakably the most severe technique of deciding how an adolescent criminal will be handled, and several purposes are built on stern crimes and age restrictions.