Technological attitudes in han china and

han and roman attitudes toward technology dbq

Both authors stated in their documents that anything created by a lower classman was only mediocre in comparison to improvements in technology created by a higher classman like a philosopher.

The documents highlighted Han and Roman attitudes towards technology. The development of mass media along with unprecedented advances in transportation and communication, due to innovative new technologies that came with industrial revolution, resulted to the formation of mass audiences for propaganda, in all sectors and for different purposes.

The leader serves by putting on a redeeming attitude, like Moses and Joshua.

The majority of attitude towards technology during the Han dynasty and Roman Empire reasonably was positive, but the portion of negative responses lay mostly in areas of lack of knowledge on the subject. An additional document that can be used to help back up the benefit of agricultural technology are record keeping of taxes and demographic statistics of Han China after the innovation of the dams and flood prevention. The Chinese tend to abide by the polite principle of depreciating oneself and respecting others to show appropriate respects towards the persons being addressed, otherwise, the addresser may be considered as ill mannered, ill educated or rude. On the other hand, few documents show points of view seeing technology in a negative light. In Document 7, an upper-class Roman philosopher and adviser to Emperor Nero named Seneca expresses that any tools created by men who are not philosophers are mediocre and insignificant. Looking over the documents, it is made obvious that all the document come from high class citizens fining us no perspective from the less wealthy. A combination of these causes sparked the slow decline of these once great empires.. The upper-class Romans thought that craftsmen, people who made a living out of making tools, was hardly an occupation that deserved any respect. The Chinese during the Han Dynasty in 2nd century B. In Document 3, an upper-class Han philosopher named Huan Tan expresses, with great enthusiasm, his point of view of the evolution of the pestle and the mortar throughout the years. I also think that in order to more efficiently analyze Document 2, we need a comparison with the journal entry from a Han Peasant. An additional document that can help us with the situation is a political speech where the emperor back-fires the nobles who were against technology. This is needed because every document we were given was written from the perspective of an upperclassmen. He helped travelers keep track of distance by measuring out every mile and placing a column there. The powerful, spoilt, wealthy Roman Emperors inevitably became corrupt and many lived a debauched, deluded and immoral lifestyle.

In Document 3, an upper-class Han philosopher named Huan Tan expresses, with great enthusiasm, his point of view of the evolution of the pestle and the mortar throughout the years.

In Document 6, Plutarch who is a Roman high official describes Gaius Gracchus in the 1st century who was a political leader.

In order to more accurately answer the question, I feel like we should have an understanding of every socioeconomic class. The first is shown in documents 1 and 8 where the sources are men with an occupation in technological work. He wanted to build roads, utility, aqueducts, and bridges. But in English speaking countries, people have a tendency to follow the reciprocal or symmetrical addressing. Perhaps their household lives were affected greatly by the creation of tools, an area of daily lives men of the upper class would have no knowledge of. A combination of these causes sparked the slow decline of these once great empires.. The powerful, spoilt, wealthy Roman Emperors inevitably became corrupt and many lived a debauched, deluded and immoral lifestyle. The emperor had power over life and death.

Related posts:. The Chinese tend to abide by the polite principle of depreciating oneself and respecting others to show appropriate respects towards the persons being addressed, otherwise, the addresser may be considered as ill mannered, ill educated or rude.

han and roman attitudes toward technology examples

In Document 7, an upper-class Roman philosopher and adviser to Emperor Nero named Seneca expresses that any tools created by men who are not philosophers are mediocre and insignificant. This shows that unlike the Roman philosopher in Document 7, Huan Tan shows no discrimination against the lower classes.

This means they must have started with an appreciation for it. I also think that in order to more efficiently analyze Document 2, we need a comparison with the journal entry from a Han Peasant. The first is shown in documents 1 and 8 where the sources are men with an occupation in technological work. The Roman documents portrayed the Romans weak reliance on technology, however they do emphasize a beauty to the aesthetic side of technology. In addition to the revival of Classical scholarship, the Renaissance period also experienced cultural, scientific and technological advancements such as the discovery and exploration of new continents. He does not feel that in order for truly excellent work, you must have a philosopher title. Both show obvious support for the technology they are associated with, preventing floods or creating aqueducts for their cities. Six of the aqueducts flowed into covered containers. Topics The worldwide transition to globalization Globalization if the process of integration and interconnectedness among economies.

Art is not a simple art activity but a scientific activity.

Rated 5/10 based on 70 review
Download
Attitudes Towards Technology: Han China and Roman Empire Essay Example