The controversy over the issue of insanity plea in the criminal justice system

insanity plea facts

With progress in neuroscience, mapping the brain and measuring its activity, the law may need to abandon or alter some of its current assumptions about the nature of voluntary conduct, which underlies various defenses.

Conclusion about past mental state with available present mental state findings is criticized by some as interpretation of reality rather than identifying objective reality.

Often the Review Board will be active in conducting an inquiry.

Problems with the insanity defense

By the time we get there, it's almost too late. Philips both appeared for the Crown concurred with the opinions of other doctors called by defense, the case collapsed. From onwards, juries could acquit the insane, and detention required a separate civil procedure Walker, It's a basic tenant of common law going back to early British law that you shall not be held responsible for something if you didn't understand that you committed it. But even before the Hinckley incident, a number of cases where the insanity defense was successful caused community concern, which led to the legislature changing the verdict of ''not guilty by reason of insanity'' to the legally fatuous but ostensibly palatable ''guilty but not criminally responsible. At the inquest in Bow Street, the verdict was willful murder and McNaughton was indicted. The expert's testimony is based on four influences: Particular symptomatology Presence of legally relevant impairments the defendant thought that killing was justified Ultimate legal conclusion the defendant was insane at the time of offence. Daniel McNaughton was the son of a Glasgow wood turner. As recently as the middle of the 19th century, insanity was a medical term for those we would now call psychotic, and was equated with behavior that was irresponsible, unpredictable and often dangerous. The Act also curbed the scope of expert psychiatric testimony and adopted stricter procedures regarding the hospitalization and release of those found not guilty by reason of insanity. The number of findings of diminished responsibility has been matched by a fall in unfitness to plead and insanity findings Walker, The psychiatrists on the commission were frequently consulted as to how new scientific developments in psychiatry affected the profession's position regarding the insanity defense. The M'Naghten rule was embraced with almost no modification by American courts and legislatures for more than years, until the midth century. Controversy[ edit ] The insanity plea is used in the U.

The recent controversy led to the examination of legal and psychiatric issues, especially the role of the psychiatrist in the courts, by Connecticut's Law Revision Commission. A Review Board must hold a hearing every 12 months unless extended to 24 months until the accused is discharged absolutely.

why the insanity defense should be allowed

As a psychiatrist, one of my main jobs is advocating for a very underserved population. The prosecution may ask for a full report which is a valid legal document. The meaning of the word "wrong" was determined in the Supreme Court case of R.

The definition of insanity is similar to the M'Naught criterion above: "the accused is insane, if during the act, due to a mental illness, profound mental retardation or a severe disruption of mental health or consciousness, he cannot understand the actual nature of his act or its illegality, or that his ability to control his behavior is critically weakened".

why is the insanity defense important
Rated 6/10 based on 4 review
The insanity defense: Related issues